Score: 7

"Goodish"

submission: Super Mario Gang Wars

date: July 24, 2006

A nice, not so new idea on marios behalf. Enough comments, onto good/bad:

THE GOOD:
Flawless animation, smooth
Good sound-overs, nice working with sprites
Funny to a certain extent

THE BAD:
Not always an original idea: -1/10
Music kinda suxored: -2/10
Aimed at a certain audience: -0/10

Comments: deserves a sequel, and youve done a good job. Try and... go there with the original ideas however. Sorry if you dissagree.

Score: 7

"Interesting! Very fascinating!"

submission: Pac

date: July 24, 2006

You've got a fluid nature for action script, for the game is bug-proof... nearly. I'll list the good bad, acrid rose style ;)

THE GOOD:
Action script fantastic
Good graphics
Unique offspin of the loved pac-man
Humorous to a certain extent

THE BAD:
Suitable name? Pac-monster or something would be better: -0/10
Glitch when switching between qualities- caught in wall: -1/10
Music just annoying!: -2/10

THE UNFORGIVABLE:
Nothing there that i wished I hadn't seen ;)

COMMENTS: Good quality, and deserves a sequel! keep it up!

Score: 7

"supreme above other tutorials"

submission: The Basics (Tutorial)

date: July 20, 2006

... so to tell you the goods and bads, let me show you them in this format:

THE GOOD:
sound selection out of this world
Good layout design
Unique style

THE BAD:
Humourless? -0/10
a bit plane? - 1/10
What audience are you aiming at? -2/10

COMMENTS: I feel the audience is aimed at people who know no flash, which is fine, but its not at my audience. Maybe something for everyone would be nice. None the less, very lovely.

Score: 8

"Interesting, different, achieving some good marks!"

submission: Experiment_16

date: July 18, 2006

THE GOOD: I like your animation - so fluid and liquid. Beautiful. there was humour in that, and the music literally melded your flash together. FANTASTIC JOB! You produced what you hoped for, i believe.

THE BAD: Now where have i seen that "magic carnaval" idea before? hehe... plus it was sortof small, and there was little meaning to it- but meaning or no meaning, i think you did a good job, but sort of... could be interperated as unoriginal

-impact against score- MINUS 2 POINTS

THE UGLY: whats going on?

-impact against score- MINUS 0 POINTS

OVERALL- interesting, nice, continue it up. A sequel is in order!
- total score- 8/10!- brill!

Score: 5

"REVIEW OF THE CENTURY- so pay attention!!!!!!!!"

submission: Cat and Hamster

date: July 14, 2006

THE GOOD:
You're style of animation is simply nice on the eye. Your graphics seem to be decent enough but its just the care of animation. You seem a very perfect animator. I want to see more from you in the future. It was a good length and.. well... its nice animation, so original- also your characters were.. mildly original.

THE BAD:
Your originality in the plot. Hold on... was that supposed to amuse everyone? The plot was not original at all, and seemed dreary, copied and used. The sort of sketch that was a "hit" once and then everyone copies it. It just seems... done... It was actually quite horrible the way the hamster dies. It was a perfect 3+ until... WHAM- blood- 15+... sick...

THE UGLY:
wtf is with your theme tune!??!?!
You NEED to get some decent songs... you are allowed to use other people's songs you know- as long as you dont sell your crap- er- movie.

OVERALLL!!!! STICK TO CARTOONS WITH ORIGINAL PLOTS! you have the skill. Now go out there are rub that cat and hamster's noses in it!!! make them lick your talent. Its good- its not great. Its original but not plot wise. Go get 'em again, tiger!

Score: 7

"Nice"

submission: Striplings 2060

date: May 25, 2006

What happens when you die all the ways possible, or if you fight all 2060 times, though? And where is this secret attack?

Score: 6

"OVERALL..."

submission: Time Squad [Part 3]

date: May 19, 2006

GOOD - PRETENTIOUS.
A film you call it? I call it three episodes, or i call it a movie - not a film. Also - the bit that was supposed to be very heartbreaking? it made little sense. None the less, I loved your story line, and the graphics and animation were brilliant.
I hate the music. Its alright to use copyrighted music since you are not selling your series. Its just midis are so pathetic and dinky sounding.
Sorry for the negative feedback, but it needed to be said.
Overall, good movie.

Score: 2

"Um, hello?"

submission: Her and Mine 1001 Wishes

date: April 28, 2006

hello?
HELLO?!
Anyone out there that realises that this movie isnt that brilliant!?
Ok, granted, some good graphics and the song was ... ok... but REPETITIVE!
Unfortunately movies with low FPSs really dont get my gears working... Also, the story... YOU HAVE... sorry to say this... LITTLE IMAGINATION - to create a moving movie, you must think outside the box.
quote "I dont like her - OOPS, said that at the wrong time" it went something like that. Um, ok, who uses OOPS in a narative. Lacking punctuation, at least the spelling was right. You change the characters alot. And this flash crammed too many stupid ideas in one. So her mother dies? gotta happen sometime. He likes her? DUH. he says he doesnt like her to someone else and she hears? BEEN THERE! i thought he was at collage but then you go on to say that he is trying to get into collage?! ok, then. Then theres the idea of this love hate relationship turning into just some stupid, unconclusive love relationship - hello!?

This reminds me of one of those annoying msn spam emails you get and they contain crappy stories in them about some girl who loves you and her mother has died.
SERIOUSLY NOW!

Score: 5

"uhmmms"

submission: Here We Go! (Sneak Peek)

date: January 15, 2006

Ok,,,, its good, i like your sprite animation, it shows true promise.

But im taking away 2 points for lack of anything in it, a further point for the probability of you not continuing it, and a further 2 points for your name - a demo!? No, thats for games. A sneak peak would be a better name. Sorry, tis only fair. Good luck if you do actually complete it.

Score: 5

"lol, ok fine"

submission: The Clocktone Genius

date: January 15, 2006

you redo his masterpiece then.